Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Francesco Forti vs Nerman Fatic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Forti vs Fatic analysis and find out who is favored!
Francesco Forti vs Nerman Fatic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Forti 2 - 0 Fatic
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Forti has won 54.71% of points on their second serve, while Fatic has won 48.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Forti, in recent form, has won 51.93% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fatic has won 44.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.43% and 31.99% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Forti has saved 61.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fatic has saved 60.51% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Forti has won 65.31% of matches played (W/L 32/ 17), with Fatic winning 50.77% (W/L 33/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Forti has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 48/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 22/ 19). Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 283/ 195), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Forti has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.07% of matches (W/L 18/ 11), where as Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 20/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Forti winning 2 times and Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Forti winning 4 and Fatic winning 1. The last match between Forti and Fatic was at the San Marino Challenger, 09-08-2022, First, Clay with Francesco Forti getting the victory 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:2:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Forti and Fatic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Forti winning 1 times and Fatic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Forti winning 1, and Fatic 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Forti has played against opponents with an average rank of 253.69 while Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 274.25.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Forti has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fatic has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Forti has converted 30.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fatic has converted 38.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
422
Rank
303
High
24
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
222
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
58% (215-158)
Career Total W/L
57% (343-258)
60% (3-2)
YTD W/L
40% (10-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$73,995
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Francesco Forti vs Nerman Fatic For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Forti VS Fatic
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Francesco Forti | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 25 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:14 | 2:2:14 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (105/154) | 57% (90/157) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (65/105) | 69% (62/90) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (28/49) | 39% (26/67) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (7/14) | 28% (5/18) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (69/157) | 40% (61/154) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Francesco Forti
Player
Nerman Fatic
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| 0-6 7-6(6) 6-3 |
Stats
Francesco Forti
Player
Nerman Fatic
67%
(
64 of
95)
1st Serve %
59%
(
58 of
98)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Francesco Forti | Nerman Fatic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (3/2) | 40% (10/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 44% (25/32) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (71/59) | 47% (257/285) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 60% (3/2) | 33% (6/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.58 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 37 | 100 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 17 | 50 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:26:24 | 1:38:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 302.16 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (245/415) | 65% (1041/1605) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (179/245) | 68% (709/1041) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 55% (93/170) | 49% (275/564) |
| BPs Won% Total | 31% (16/52) | 39% (51/132) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (188/454) | 36% (589/1620) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 39% (7/11) |
| Futures W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (3/5) | 39% (9/23) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (1/3) | 29% (2/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 75% (12/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 25% (12/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 8% (13/1) |
Francesco Forti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Stefano D'Agostino
Player
Francesco Forti
62%
(
73 of
118)
1st Serve %
62%
(
63 of
102)
9
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
0
78%
(
57 of
73)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
52 of
63)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
36 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
25%
(
26 of
102)
108
Total Points Won
112
|
6-7(3) 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Forti
Player
Jacopo Bilardo
71%
(
80 of
112)
1st Serve %
51%
(
58 of
114)
7
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
71%
(
57 of
80)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
42 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
114)
118
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Francesco Forti
66%
(
64 of
97)
1st Serve %
49%
(
51 of
104)
0
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
31 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
46 of
104)
103
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Forti
Player
Lorenzo Ferri
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Forti
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
64)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Francesco Forti
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
0
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(3) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Forti
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
60%
(
3 of
5)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
0%
(
0 of
3)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
5
Total Points Won
5
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Forti
Player
Alexandros Skorilas
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
42%
(
28 of
67)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Vladyslav Orlov
Player
Francesco Forti
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesco Forti
Player
Mario Gonzalez Fernandez
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
37 of
71)
8
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
26 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(1) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
82
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Nerman Fatic
77%
(
72 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
48 of
79)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
37 of
48)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
79)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
62%
(
13 of
21)
1st Serve %
38%
(
8 of
21)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
29
Total Points Won
13
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Adrian Andreev
68%
(
50 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
32 of
47)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marco Trungelliti
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
71%
(
63 of
89)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
37%
(
13 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
43%
(
41 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Aziz Dougaz
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Timofey Skatov
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Felipe Meligeni Alves
Player
Nerman Fatic
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
3
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Nerman Fatic
57%
(
49 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
29 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 7-6(6) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Forti Vs Fatic Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Forti are available here and Fatic photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
